Nuclear Controversies/International pressure on Fukushima - repeat of Chernobyl?

By Wladimir Tchertkoff (2004), Source: Vimeo

International pressure on Fukushima - repeat of Chernobyl?

The Fukushima Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety will be held from the 15th to the 17th of December. It will take place in Koriyama, Fukushima Prefecture and is organized jointly by the Japanese government and by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The objectives of the conference are highly significant: to share the knowledge and the lessons learned from the nuclear accident at Fukushima Daiichi; and thereby to contribute to the strengthening of nuclear safety worldwide. About 1,000 people from more than 120 countries and organizations are expected to attend.

 

In addition, during the conference, Fukushima Prefecture and the IAEA are planning to sign a co-operation agreement for the establishment of two joint research centres in Fukushima: these centres will focus on decontamination, radiological protection and the safety of nuclear facilities.

IAEA has been closely involved with Fukushima in the aftermath of the disaster.

 

While IAEA has been playing a lead role in the international response to the catastrophic accident, IAEA is essentially a nuclear power promoting agency. In September 2011, they had a prominent presence in the conference held in Fukushima called “the International Expert Symposium on Radiation and Health Risks”. Only six months after the accident, the conference already offered its conclusions that "the physical health impact of radiation on the general public is likely to be limited and to be lower than that from Chernobyl, where the only validated cancer was thyroid cancer." This year, IAEA sent one of its management staff to Fukushima Medical University as a visiting professor. The University is in charge of the highly criticized Fukushima Residents' Health Management Survey. A serious question arises regarding the involvement of the nuclear power promoting agency in this heath survey. In addition, Fukushima prefecture declared itself for a future with no nuclear power. This is not IAEA's position. More on this at Asahi Shinbun News

 

One needs to understand in this respect what the pro-nuclear international organizations have done about Chernobyl. It is vital that this tragedy is not repeated in Fukushima. The film “Nuclear Controversies” depicts how the World Health Organisation (WHO) was made powerless in publishing its own assessment of the health impact of radiation, through a long-previous 1959 agreement with the IAEA. The footage taken from the 2001 WHO Congress in Kiev actually shows heated arguments between representatives of IAEA, ICRP and UNSCEAR and the researchers and the medical doctors from Chernobyl. The scientific evidence provided by the latter on the effect of low-level radiation and internal exposure to radiation was denied outright by the nuclear promoting agencies. Dr. Yablokov makes reference to the study done by Dr. Bandazhevski – whose stated findings led to his imprisonment! Please refer to: "Chernobyl – Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment"

 

World Network for Saving Children from Radiation

Write a comment

Comments: 1
  • #1

    W. Scott Smith (Thursday, 20 December 2012 13:04)

    I realize that, for you, my proposal comes under the category of "Not my job." This is not my job either, but something must be done. I realize that a whole world of experts are stumped as to how the Fukushima Daiichi Reactor 4 Fuel Rod Assemblies safely onto the ground before another earthquake endangers all of us.--Really, that is the actual problem-----seemingly, they are all focused on trying to move the fuel rod assemblies when they should focus on moving the ground, instead! Please do what ever you can to get this idea passed around, even just to random contacts in the right offices and industries. The lives you save may may include yours or those of your posterity.

    We need to stop demanding more cooks in the Tepco kitchen. If no one already has a better idea, then this must be done without delay!!!

    "Bringing the Mountain to Mohammed!"

    If we cannot immediately get the fuel rods safely down to the ground, then we must immediately bring the ground up to support the floor that holds the fuel pond: Fill and surround the Reactor 4 building with a stable mix of gravel and sand---maybe just a little cement. (Cement produces too much heat to quickly cure a large block, which is part of why they discarded this sort of solution prematurely.)

    Alternatively: Fill and surround the building with Styrene Foam.------This would be the quickest solution, as well as the best way to preserve access using cardboard tube tunnels. As well as merely supporting the building, it will immobilize the structural members, thus preserving whatever structural integrity is left.